messages
listlengths 3
3
|
|---|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Mio knows that sorrow is life's constant companion.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n美緒は悲しみが人生の伴侶であることを知っています。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n米欧知道悲伤是生命的永恒伴侣。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Not this one.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nこれはそうではありません。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n不是这个。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Ahoj, ten byt vypadá opravdu hezky a čistě.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nЗдрастуйте, ця квартира виглядає дуже красиво і акуратно.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nПривіт, ця квартира виглядає дуже красиво і чисто.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Dominatorin hadert: Wieder keine WM-Medaille für Goggia\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nDominator hadert: No more world medal for Goggia\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nDominatrix struggles: Still no World Championship medal for Goggia\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Výsledky přijímacích zkoušek budou zveřejněny do 2 pracovních dnů po zpřístupnění hodnocení uchazeče Centrem pro zjišťování výsledků ve vzdělávání na webových stránkách školy a před budovou školy (nejpozději 2. 5. 2022).\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nРезультати вступних іспитів будуть оприлюднені протягом 2 робочих днів після того, як оцінка кандидата буде розкрита Центром з'ясування результатів навчання на сайті школи та перед будівлею школи (найпізніше 2. 5. Візьміть з собою 2022).\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nРезультати вступних іспитів будуть оприлюднені протягом 2 робочих днів після того, як оцінка кандидата буде розкрита Центром з'ясування результатів навчання на сайті школи та перед будівлею школи (найпізніше 2. 5. Візьміть з собою 2022).\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Their careers range from infectious disease doctors to psychologists to mindfulness teachers - and they all had great advice to give on how to stay motivated and keep the ball rolling.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n彼らのキャリアは、感染症の医師から心理学者、マインドフルネスの教師まで多岐にわたっており、やる気を維持し、ボールを転がし続ける方法につい\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n彼らのキャリアは、感染症の医師から心理学者、マインドフルネスの教師まで多岐にわたり、モチベーションを維持し、ボールを転がし続ける方法についての素晴らしいアドバイスがありました。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Jaká byla síla potřebná k vytažení řepy?\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nЯка сила була потрібна, щоб витягнути цю капусту?\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nЯка сила була необхідна, щоб витягнути буряк?\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: So, you mentioned one and that is profanity filtering m evaluation.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nそれで、あなたは1つ言及しました、そしてそれは冒涜フィルタリングm評価です。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nそれで、あなたは1つに言及しました、そしてそれは冒とく的なフィルタリングm評価です。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: And we need to collect it, prepare it manually, create it somewhat.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n収集し 手作業で準備し 作る必要があります\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我们需要收集它,手工准备,创造它.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: As the car changes, so does Arnie, whose newfound confidence turns to arrogance behind the wheel of his exotic beauty.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n車が変わるにつれて、アーニーも変わります。アーニーの新たな自信は、彼のエキゾチックな美しさのハンドルを握る傲慢さに変わります。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n随着汽车的变化,这样做Arnie,其新发现的信心转向傲慢背后他的异国情调的美丽的车轮。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: As of now, the Kazakhstani rescue team pulled out seven quake survivors and the bodies of 19 people, including one kid, in Türkiye.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n現在、カザフスタンの救助隊は、テュルキエで7人の地震の生存者と1人の子供を含む19人の遺体を引き出しました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n截至目前,\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Also if your dog likes to roll around in raccoon poop like mine does it is such a pain in the butt to clean.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n另外,如果你的狗喜欢像我一样在浣熊的粪便滚来滚去,它是如此的痛苦,在屁股清洁。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n另外，如果你的狗喜欢像我一样在浣熊粪便中打滚，那么清理屁股就太痛苦了。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: From the very beginning it did not feel like the other tomb raider games.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n最初から、他の墓の襲撃ゲームのようには感じませんでした。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n从一开始，它就感觉不像其他的盗墓游戏。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I really hope the seller did not send me a use drone as i paid for a new one.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n私は,私が新しいのを買ったように使用ドローンを送りません.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我真的希望卖家没有给我寄一架二手无人机，因为我买了一架新的。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 2023.02.10 - 株式会社いわき民報社\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n10/02/2023 - The Iwaki Minpo\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n2023.02.10 - Iwaki Minpo Co., Ltd.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: BUYER BE AWARE!!!!!!!!!!!\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n購入者の注意!!!!!!!!!!!\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n購入者は注意してください!!!!!!!!!\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: It's Fake News, CBN Debunks Claim It Lacks Capacity To Print More New Naira Notes\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nこれはフェイクニュースだ、CBNは新たなナイラ紙幣をさらに印刷する能力がないと主張、その誤りを暴く\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nそれは偽のニュースです、CBNはそれがより多くの新しいナイラノートを印刷する能力を欠いていると主張します\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: He was 95.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n他是95。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n享年95岁。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: And I still have NO IDEA what I could have possibly done to deserve this.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n我仍然不知道我能做些什么来配得上这个。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我仍然不知道我能做些什么值得这样做。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 泡立てるにはコツが必要…\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nYou need a knack to make a whisk...\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nI have to do a lot of work.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 端子台 貫通の通販。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nMail order through terminal block.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nTerminal Stand No returns or exchanges.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Je to trumf, jímž se může se svou kariérou rozloučit tak, že se na to dlouho nezapomene.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nЦе є атрибут, з яким він може прощатися зі своєю кар'єрою так, щоб не забути його довго.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nЦе козир, який він може розпрощатися зі своєю кар'єрою так, що він надовго про це не забуде.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Expenses, meanwhile, have reportedly risen 11% since the origin of the 2015 mortgage.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n一方、2015年の住宅ローンの発端以来、経費は11 %増加したと報告されている。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n与此同时，据报道，自 2015 年抵押贷款发放以来，支出增加了 11%。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Biden DOJ 'Doesn't Want an Armed Citizenry'\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nバイデン司法省は武装した市民を望んでいない」。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n拜登司法部“不想要武装公民”\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Less than half of Zimbabwe's 16 million citizens have access to electricity, and a global squeeze on funding new coal-fired capacity has limited the country's ability to plug chronic power cuts that have lasted as long as 18 hours in recent days.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n電気は1600万人の市民の半数以下で,世界の石炭火力発電の資金調達の縮小が,近頃18時間ほどの停電を阻止する国の能力を制限している.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n津巴布韦1600万公民中只有不到一半能够获得电力，全球对新燃煤发电能力的资金紧缩限制了该国填补最近几天持续长达18小时的长期停电的能力。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Don't doesn't even do anything about it you know they just let the hackers do whatever they want and then they do know that the game is terrible but they're doing absolutely nothing about it and the game keeps on doing updates about their characters really what they should be updating is the physics because it's terrible don't buy this game the physics are terrible and mechanics are terrible the people that obviously the people that built this game was high or something because it's one of the worst games I've honestly ever played in my life I would rather play Pixel Games in this crap it's one of the worst games don't buy\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nコンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは, コンピュータのゲームは,\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n你知道他们只是让黑客做他们想要的,然后他们确实知道游戏是可怕的,但他们做了绝对没有什么,游戏继续更新他们的角色真的应该更新是物理,因为它是可怕的不要买这个游戏的物理是可怕的和机械是可怕的人,显然,这款游戏的人是高或某种东西,因为它是最糟糕的游戏之一\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I was disappointed because it seemed like it would have been a good deal if it had not been for that.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nそれはそれのためではなかった場合、それは良い取引だっただろうように思えたので、私は失望しました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我很失望，因为如果不是因为这个原因，这笔交易似乎很划算。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: So, <parallel_talk> aiming towards [ORGANISATION62] deadline with subtitler study paper. </parallel_talk>\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n<parallel_talk>[ORGANISATION62]deadlinewithsubtitlerstudypaper.</parallel_talk>\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n因此， < Parallel_talk >在[ORGANISATION62]的最后期限前完成了字幕研究论文。< /parallel_talk >\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The only thing I had an issue with, was it was really plain.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n唯一的问题是,它真的很平淡.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我唯一有问题的是，它真的很简单。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: We are very heavy handed and tend to wear out 2-3 controllers per year.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n年間2~3台のコントローラを 使い切る傾向があります\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我们的手很笨重，每年都会磨损2-3个控制器。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Four New Jersey teenagers have been charged in connection with the attack of a 14-year-old girl who later took her own life after video of the incident was posted on social media.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nニュージャージー州のティーンエイジャー4人は、事件の映像がソーシャルメディアに投稿された後、後に自身の人生を歩んだ14歳の少女の攻撃に関連して起訴されている。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n四名新泽西州青少年因袭击一名 14 岁女孩而被指控，该事件的视频发布在社交媒体上后，这名女孩随后自杀了。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: One person has been arrested amid a protest outside Tate Britain, where a drag queen storytelling event for children was being hosted.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nテート・ブリテンの外で抗議があり、子供のためのドラッグクイーンのストーリーテリングイベントが催されていた中で、一人の人が逮捕されました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n一人在泰特英国以外的抗议活动中被捕，那里举办了一场儿童拖网女王讲故事活动。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Will still linger a bit longer on here and think about whether I should migrate at all.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n移住すべきかどうか考えます. 私は,私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族と私の家族\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我还会在这里多逗留一会儿，思考我是否应该迁移。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 教えてください！\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nTell us about it!\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nPlease tell me!\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: せめて女性だけでも感情的な対立を止めて肩を組んでこの社会に立ち向かう時ではないか。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nt isn't it time for women alone to stop the emotional conflict and stand shoulder to shoulder to confront this society?\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nAt the very least, it is time for women alone to stop emotional confrontation and stand on their shoulders to confront this society.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Dr. Friederike Schuler ist freie Kunsthistorikerin und Kuratorin und hat 2013 zu der Wandmalerei der Weimarer Republik promoviert. Seither forscht sie zu baugebundener Kunst sowie Kunst- und Institutionsgeschichte der Nachkriegszeit in Deutschland, zuletzt gemeinsam mit Sebastian Freytag zu Kunst am Bau in NRW. Nach dem Vortrag findet die letzte Kuratorenführung durch die Ausstellung statt. Die Künstlerinnen und Künstler sind vor Ort.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nDr. Friederike Schuler is a freelance art historian and curator and in 2013 she received her doctorate in mural painting of the Weimar Republic. Since then she has been researching building-based art as well as art and institution history of the post-war period in Germany, most recently together with Sebastian Freytag on art on construction in NRW.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nDr. Friederike Schuler is a freelance art historian and curator and received her doctorate in 2013 on mural painting in the Weimar Republic. Since then she has been researching post-war art as well as art and institutional history in Germany, most recently with Sebastian Freytag on Kunst am Bau in NRW. After the lecture, the final curator’s guided tour of the exhibition will take place. The artists will be on site.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Finissage im Marler Skulpturenmuseum\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nFinissage at the Marler Sculpture Museum\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nFinissage im Marler Skulpturenmuseum.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: (PERSON2) Because like the way I believe Martin does his <unintelligible/> little translation, so he translates more sentences at once and then picks only the centre one and goes like this for the whole document.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n(PERSON2) マーティンが彼の <unintelligible/> の小さな翻訳をするのと同じように、彼は一度により多くの文を翻訳し、それから中央だけを選んで、文書全体のようにします。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n(PERSON2) <unintelligible/> 私が信じているように、Martinは小さな翻訳を行うので、彼は一度に複数の文章を翻訳し、中央の1つだけを選択し、文書全体についてこのように行きます。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Nebo co by mohlo pomoct novým žákům z Ukrajiny tady na škole?\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nАбо що може допомогти новим студентам з України тут, у школі?\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nАбо що може допомогти новим учням з України тут, у школі?\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: It takes the state's governor.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n这需要州长的决定。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n它需要国家的州长。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I support this, it's great that, [PERSON7], you have thought of [PERSON11].\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n我支持这个，[PERSON7]，你能想到[PERSON11]，真是太好了。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIsupport支持this,it'sgreatthat,[PERSON7],youhavethoughtof[PERSON11].\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Of those the Gumdrop is about the best, but it has some serious issues.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nゴムドロップはその中でベストです しかし,深刻な問題があります\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n其中 Gumdrop 差不多是最好的，但它有一些严重的问题。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 用紙にツヤとハリを出し水や汚れから守ります。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nIt is used to protect the paper from water and dirt.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIt protects the paper from water and dirt.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: \"We were unaware of the road sign in the vicinity of this bus stop. However, in light of the concerns raised by CornwallLive, we have asked for our advertisement to be removed,\" the fast-food brand said.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n\"我们对这座公交车站附近的路牌没有了解. 然而,鉴于康沃尔生活的担忧, 我们已要求删除我们的广告\", 这家快餐品牌表示.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n该快餐品牌表示：“我们不知道这个巴士站附近的路牌，但鉴于CornwallLive提出的问题，我们要求删除我们的广告。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I ordered from this company because I've bought it previous seasons and it worked great for us.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n前のシーズンで買ったので この会社から注文したんです 素晴らしい結果でした\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我是从这家公司订购的,\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: \"Although I can see the funny side, it is tasteless and I'm sure some grieving family members won't like to see it when visiting Penmount for the funeral and cremation of a loved one,\" said a resident whose mother-in-law was cremated at the funeral home last year, as quoted by British media.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n一位住家的一位住在那里的老婆去年被火烧死, 据英国媒体报道,\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n英国媒体援引一位居民的话说：“虽然我能看到有趣的一面，但它毫无品味，我敢肯定，一些悲伤的家庭成员不会喜欢在前往彭芒特参加亲人的葬礼和火葬时看到它，”他的岳母去年在殡仪馆火化。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Co jste probírali minulou hodinu?\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nЩо ви говорили в минулому часу?\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nЩо ви обговорювали на минулому занятті?\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: そうですね。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThat's right.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nYes, it is.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 話題の活力サプリをご紹介。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nI've got the energy supplement to the topic.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nHere are some popular vitality supplements.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 1周し終わって過去問受けてみたら 当時40が平均の俺が70。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nWhen I finished one lap and took the past exam, I was 70, the average being 40 at the time.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nWhen I finished one lap and took the past questions, I was 70, with 40 being the average at that time.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I have been toying with this little piece on my head for a few days now.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n数日間、私の頭の上でこの小さなピースをいじっています。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n几天来，我一直在头上玩弄这个小块。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Porro had an afternoon to forget against Leicester (Picture: Getty)\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n波罗有一个下午忘记对莱斯特(图片:盖蒂)\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nPorro有一个下午要忘记对阵莱斯特(图片：盖蒂)\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The brightly lit advert, which was placed directly behind a sign pointing to the crematorium, was branded as \"tasteless\" by some angry locals.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n火葬場を指さすサインの真後ろに配置された明るいライト広告は、一部の怒りの地元住民から「味のない」とブランド化された。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n火葬場を指す看板のすぐ後ろに置かれた明るく照らされた広告は、怒っている地元の人々によって「味がない」という烙 印を押されました。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I really hope the seller did not send me a use drone as i paid for a new one.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n私は新品を購入したので、販売者が私に中古のドローンを送らなかったことを切に願う。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n私は本当に売り手が私に新しいものを支払ったように使用ドローンを送っていないことを願っています。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: OBRAZEM: To je ale nádhera.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nЗображення: яка гарна річ.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nЗображення: Яка прекрасна річ.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Geschmack wie Quench aus den 90er, von wegen Orange, aber das ist auch egal. 5 Tage jeden morgen ein Päckchen: es hat sich nichts bewegt, aber rein gar nichts. Mein Bauchumfang ist um 12 cm gewachsen! Blähungen wie noch nie! Danach Durchfälle 5-8 mal täglich. Wenig hilfreich, leider trotz sofortigen Absetzen bleibt der Durchfall schon seit 1 Woche. Es ist zu bemerken das bei der kleineren Verpackungsgröße nur 2 Sterne (leider erst zu spät gesehen) gegeben wurden, bei der größeren volle 5 ? Das ist sehr sehr merkwürdig!\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nTaste like quench from the 90s, because of orange, but that does not matter. 5 Days every morning a parcel: Nothing has moved, but nothing is pure. My belly circumference has grown by 12 cm! Flatulence like never before! Then diarrhea 5-8 times daily. Not very helpful, unfortunately despite immediate weaning, diarrhoea has remained for 1 week. It should be noted that with the smaller packaging size only 2 stars (unfortunately seen too late) were given, with the larger full 5? That is very strange!\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nTastes like Quench from the 90s, because of Orange, but that doesn't matter. 5 days every morning a package: nothing has moved, but absolutely nothing. My belly circumference has grown by 12 cm! Inflation like never before! Diarrhea 5-8 times a day. Helpless, unfortunately despite immediate discontinuation, diarrhea has remained for 1 week. It should be noted that for the smaller packaging size only 2 stars (unfortunately seen too late) were given, for the larger full 5 ? This is very very strange!\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Here are the top four approaches that they use.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n実験の方法の4つを紹介します\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n以下は、彼らが用いる4つのアプローチのトップである。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: However, not everyone was quite so offended by the unfortunate placement of the advertisement, with one noting that a person's reaction to it would likely be influenced by \"how long ago you followed the crematorium sign wearing a black tie.\"\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nしかし、誰もが広告の残念な掲載にそれほど腹を立てたわけではなく、広告に対する人の反応は「黒いネクタイを着て火葬場の看板にどれくらい前に従ったか」に影響される可能性が高いと指摘する人もいます。 「\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nしかし、不運な広告の配置に対してそこまで不快に感じる人は全員ではなく、一部の人々は「黒いネクタイを着けて火葬場の看板を追ったのがどれくらい前か」によって、それに対する反応が大きく影響を受けるであろうと指摘していました。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: And later on, we may do something more about the multi-accent thing.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n後日マルチセントの事柄についてもっと考えてみましょう\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nそして後で、マルチアクセントについてさらに何かを行うかもしれません。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Writing on Twitter, the drag queen said the day had been \"proper emotional,\" adding that five protesters had gained entry to the Tate and \"caused a disruption\" in parts of the building, but they did not affect the readings.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n拖网女王在推特上写道，这一天“情绪适当”，并补充说，五名抗议者已经进入泰特河，并对大楼的部分地区“造成了破坏”，但他们没有影响读数。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n在Twitter上写道，变装皇后说，这一天是“适当的情绪化”，并补充说，五名抗议者已经进入泰特美术馆，并在部分建筑中“造成干扰”，但他们并没有影响阅读。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 上も下もすそ広がりでウザイので、下をパンツスタイルにするとか、タイト系にするとかは？\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThe top and bottom are wide and annoying, so why not make the bottom pants style or tight type?\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nThe top and bottom are wide and annoying, so why not make the bottom pants style or tight?\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: For example, there were just shy of 7,000 citizens from South American countries in 2022, while there was a smidge over 3,000 nationals hailing from North and Central America.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nたとえば、2022年には南米諸国から7,000人の市民が恥ずかしがり屋でしたが、北アメリカと中央アメリカから3,000人以上の国民が集まっていました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n例えば、2022年には南米諸国から7,000人の市民が恥ずかしがり屋でしたが、北米と中米から3,000人を超える人々が集まりました。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: And for like multi-token constraints and this kind of stuff.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n这类的东西.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nAndforlikemulti-token多令牌constraints限制andthiskind类ofstuff东东.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: And if he sometimes manages to say also correctly, then yeah, again, you will see that in the data.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nデータの通りになるのです そして,もし,\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n而且，如果他有时也设法说得对，那么是的，再说一遍，你会在数据中看到这一点。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Don't doesn't even do anything about it you know they just let the hackers do whatever they want and then they do know that the game is terrible but they're doing absolutely nothing about it and the game keeps on doing updates about their characters really what they should be updating is the physics because it's terrible don't buy this game the physics are terrible and mechanics are terrible the people that obviously the people that built this game was high or something because it's one of the worst games I've honestly ever played in my life I would rather play Pixel Games in this crap it's one of the worst games don't buy\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nそれについて何もしないでくださいあなたは彼らがハッカーに彼らが望むことを何でもさせたことを知っています、そして彼らはゲームがひどいことを知っていますが、彼らはそれについて全く何もしていません、そしてゲームは彼らのキャラクターについて更新し続けます本当に彼らが更新すべきものはそれがひどいので物理学ですこのゲームを買わないでください物理学はひどいですそして力学はひどいです明らかに人々である人々であるこのゲームを構築したのは私が人生で正直にプレイした中で最悪のゲームの1つであるため、高かったか何かでした私はむしろこのたわごとでピクセルゲームをプレイしたいと思いますそれは購入しない最悪のゲームの1つですそれは購入する最悪のゲームの1つですそれは購入しないでください。これは最悪のゲームの1つです。購入しないでください。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n他们甚至对此无动于衷，你知道他们只是让黑客随心所欲，然后他们知道这个游戏很糟糕，但他们对此毫无作为，游戏还在不断更新他们的角色，真正应该更新的是物理效果，因为它太糟糕了，不要购买这个游戏，物理效果和机制都很糟糕，显然制作这个游戏的人可能是在嗨或者什么的，因为这是我一生中玩过的最糟糕的游戏之一，我宁愿玩像素游戏也不愿玩这个烂游戏，这是最糟糕的游戏之一，不要购买。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: But the thing is with this with the concatenation is not completely sure whether it has the same effect as we do multi encoder setting-\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n但事情是与这与串联是不完全肯定它是否有同样的效果,因为我们做多编码器设置-\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n但事情是这样的，串联并不完全确定它是否具有相同的效果，因为我们做多编码器设置-\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: It's exciting, nerve-wracking, stressful, and all the good things that I love about working in games.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nわくわくするし 神経質になるし ストレスもかかるし ゲームを作るのが好きなのは 良いことです\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nそれはエキサイティングで、神経質で、ストレスがあり、ゲームで働くことについて私が愛するすべての良いことです。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 狭い範囲に塗布する場合は、付属のノズルを使用してください。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nIf you're applying to a narrow area, use the attached nozzle.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIf applying to a small area, use the included nozzle.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: ⇒物価高影響で1粒当たり平均25円アップ\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n⇒An average increase of 25 yen per tablet due to high prices\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n⇒ average increase of 25 yen per tablet due to high prices\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: First off, it's not water resistant and it is not recommended to use while swimming per the instruction manual.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nまず、防水仕様ではないので、取扱説明書によれば、水泳中の使用は推奨されていない。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n首先,它不耐水, 根据使用说明书,\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Zkoušíme ruštinu, angličtinu a věřím, že ti to bude fungovat.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nМи пробуємо російську, англійську, і я вірю, що у вас це вийде.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nпробуємо російську, англійську, і я вірю, що це спрацює для вас\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Curious, I kept an open mind to compare how Google Maps and Apple Maps compare, on my test iPhone device (my daily driver is an Android device, so it's rare that I use an iPhone).\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n好奇心旺盛な私は、GoogleマップとAppleマップを比較するためにオープンマインドを保ちました。テスト用のiPhoneデバイス(私の毎日のドライバーはAndroidデバイスなので、iPhoneを使用することはめったにありません)。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n好奇的是，在我的测试iPhone设备上，我保持开放的心态来比较谷歌地图和苹果地图的比较情况（我的日常驱动程序是安卓设备，所以我很少使用iPhone）。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I know that.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n分かってる\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n私はそれを知っています。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: その後は、近代植物分類学者の牧野富太郎（１８６２～１９５７年）が、１９０３（明治３６）年に地元研究者らの採集品を基に「ナンブトラノオ」「コバノツメクサ」「ナンブイヌナズナ」、０５（同３８）年には自ら早池峰山に登り発見し命名した「カトウハコベ」などを発表した。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThis was followed by the discovery of \"Bistorta hayachinensis,\" \"Minuartia verna (L.) Hiem var. japonica H. Hara,\" and \"Draba japonica\" in 1903 (Meiji 36) by modern-day botanist Makino Tomitaro (1862-1957), and in 1905 (Meiji 38), Makino personally climbed Mount Hayachine to discover and name \"Arenaria katoana.\"\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nAfter that, Tomitaro MAKINO (1862-1957), a modern botanical taxonomist, published 'Nambutorano,' 'Kobanotsumekusa,' and 'Nambuinunazuna' based on the materials collected by local researchers in 1903, and 'Katohakobe,' which he himself discovered and named by climbing Mt. Hayachine in 1905.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: It was packaged well and did arrive quickly.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n梱包はしっかりしていて、すぐに届きました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nそれはよく包まれ、すぐに到着しました。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Broke in less than a week\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n1週間未満で壊れた\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n在不到一周的时间里破产\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 春雷、雪下ろしと言われる物ではないですか？\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nAre you talking about spring thunder, or thunder before a snow storm?\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIsn't it what is said to be spring lightning and snow down?\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 今晩は。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nTonight.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nTonight.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: プライム会員なら通常配送料無料。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nIf you are a Prime member, the shipping fee is usually free.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nPrime members get free standard shipping.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: (PERSON8) Or I tried it with Marian just attending it and it's... I don't know how many BLEU points lower.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n(PERSON8) それとも、マリアンと一緒に試したばかりで、BLEUポイントがどれだけ下がっているかわからない。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n或是我试过Marian参加了,结果...\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Good critique is there to correct the problem quickly, and isn't directed at your ability.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n良い批評は問題を迅速に修正するためにあるものであり、あなたの能力に向けられたものではありません。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n良い批評は問題を迅速に修正するためにあり、あなたの能力に向けられていません。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Žena se okamžitě bratříčka ujala, jelikož je ale v tuto chvíli na mateřské a výdaje se začínají kupit, tak prosí o pomoc.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nЖінка відразу подбала про брата, але так як в даний час знаходиться в декреті і витрати починають накопичуватися, просить про допомогу.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nЖінка відразу взяла на себе братика, але в цей момент вона перебуває на материнській основі, і витрати починають купуватися, тому вона просить про допомогу.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Kriminalisté třiadvacetiletého muže obvinili z trestných činů krádeže, porušování domovní svobody a neoprávněného opatření, padělání a pozměnění platebního prostředku.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nСлідчі висунули 23-річному чоловікові звинувачення у крадіжці, порушенні недоторканності житла та несанкціонованому володінні, підробці та зміні платіжного засобу.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nПравоохоронці висунули 23-річному чоловікові обвинувачення у вчиненні злочинів за крадіжку, порушення домашнього арешту, незаконні заходи, підробку та зміну платіжного засобу.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: But did I love it?\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n好きだったの?\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n但是我喜欢它吗？\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Takovou příležitost Zeman, známý svým ústavním kutilstvím, přeci nevynechá.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nЗеман, відомий своїми конституційними ухиляннями, не пропускає такої можливості.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nТаку нагоду Земан, відомий своїм конституційним майстернітством, звичайно, не пропустить.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Me extracting functionality of my #Axum projects into shared libraries: \"Hold my keyboard\" :partyparrot: :helix: :ferrisdance:\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n#Axumプロジェクトの機能を共有ライブラリに抽出します。\"Holdmykeyboard\":partyparrot::helix::ferrisdance:\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我正在将我#Axum项目的功能提取到共享库中：“拿着我的键盘” :partyparrot: :helix: :ferrisdance:\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Já jsem tady dal takové kleště na ty plastové profily, aby se to dalo stříhat pod úhlem.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nЯ поклав такі кліжки на пластикові профілі, щоб можна було вирізати під кутом.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nЯ тут поставив такі щипці на ці пластикові профілі щоб це можна було стригти під кутом.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Notably, a 7.7 magnitude quake that devastated parts of southeast Türkiye and northern Syria hit early Monday.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n特に、トルキエ南東部とシリア北部の一部を荒廃させたマグニチュード7.7の地震が月曜日の初めに襲った。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n值得注意的是，周一早些时候发生的7.7级地震摧毁了土耳其东南部和叙利亚北部的部分地区。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: George Howarth, who represents Knowsley in the UK Parliament, said the violence on Friday night did not reflect the community.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n英国議会でノーズリーを代表するジョージ・ハワース氏は、金曜日の夜の暴力は地域社会を反映していないと述べた。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n代表诺斯利在英国议会的乔治·霍华德说,\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: まつ毛を上げた後すく下がってしまうのですが、上げた状態をキープできる方法教えて欲しいです\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nI want you to tell me how you can keep your eyelashes up.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nMy eyelashes drop back down after I raise them, but I would like you to tell me how to keep them raised.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I'm not sure if there's something not compatible or if this is just poorly made, but I'm not going to sit and hold my device in while it charges.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n互換性のないものがあるのか、これが不十分なのかはわかりませんが、充電中に座ってデバイスを保持するつもりはありません。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我不确定是否有不兼容的东西，或者如果这只是粗制滥造，但我不会坐在那里拿着我的设备，而它充电。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Broke in less than a week\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n不到一周就坏了\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n不到一周就破产了\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 今は、6月ですが肩出しの服着ててもおかしくないですよね？\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nNow it's June, but it's not funny to wear a shouldered clothing, right?\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nNow, it's 6 months, but it's not funny if you wear shoulder-length clothes, right?\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 曲はやっぱりかっこいいですね！\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThe song is cool after all, but that’ s really cool.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nThe song is cool after all!\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Still can’t believe Logitech discontinued this remote, nothing else comes close in comparison.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nロジクールがこのリモコンを廃止したとはまだ信じられませんが、他には何も比較して近くにはありません。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n仍然无法相信罗技已经停产了这款遥控器，没有其他任何产品可以与之相提并论。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: There's a lot of well good stuff in this mysterious collective's backlog.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nこの謎めいた集団のバックログには、良いものがたくさんあります。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nこの神秘的な集団のバックログには、良いものがたくさんあります。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: \"Or, as an industry catch phrase goes: A late game is only late until it ships.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n\"遅れたゲームは 発売されるまで遅れている.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n“或者，正如一个行业流行语所说:晚期游戏只有到发货才算晚。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 人と周囲の温度差から人の動きを検知する人感センサーを、車内の天井３カ所に設置。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThe human sensors are installed in three ceilings of the car to detect the temperature difference between the person and the surrounding environment.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nA sensor that detects the movement of people from the temperature difference between people and the surroundings is installed in three ceilings in the car.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: He also argues that NDP and progressives want to depopulate society for the sake of the environment.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n彼はまた、NDPと進歩主義者が環境のために社会を人口減少させたいと主張しています。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n他还认为，NDP 和进步人士希望以保护环境为目的减少社会人口。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Leider zu groß für unter 1 Jahr\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nUnfortunately too big for less than 1 year\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nUnfortunately too big for under 1 year\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.