Split (1)

train · 270k rows

messages listlengths 3 3
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Vím že jsem trouba, dost lidí si že mě dělá rohozku, ale od tebe jsem to nečekal.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nЯ знаю, що я сучий, багато людей думають, що мені роблю рогожку, але я не чекав цього від тебе.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nЯ знаю, що я піч, багато людей думають, що я роблю рогівку, але я не чекав від тебе цього.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Zatím Ukrajinky dělají buď tohle nebo pracují v továrně, ale to je těžká práce.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nПоки що українські жінки або займаються цим, або працюють на фабриці, але це важка праця.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nПоки що українки або займаються цим, або працюють на фабриці, але це важка робота.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 口コミチェックはホテル選びの新常識。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nWord-of-mouth check is the new common sense of hotel selection.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nWord-of-mouth checking is the new normal for choosing a hotel.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Debevoise was chosen because of its expertise in impeachment and bipartisan experience in working with Congress on oversight.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nDebevoiseが選ばれたのは、弾劾における専門知識と、議会との監督における超党派的な経験のためである。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nDebevoiseは、弾劾に関する専門知識と議会との監督に関する作業における超党派の経験のために選ばれました。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: さくさくっとかんたん見積りしてみませんか？\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nWhy don't you make a quick estimate?\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nWhy don't you make a quick and easy estimate?\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: (PERSON2) Yes, that's the only stuff I did for positive constraints.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n(PERSON2) 是的，这是我为积极约束所做的唯一一件事。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n是的，这是我为积极的约束所做的唯一的事情。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: やばな\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\ndangerous\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nYabana\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The time frame also includes several months when Kilcher worked on \"Yellowstone,\" despite the actor's claims that she was too injured to work.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n演技の時間枠にはキルチャーが\"イエローストーン\"で働いた数ヶ月も含まれています演技の時間枠にはキルチャーが\"イエローストーン\"で働いた数ヶ月も含まれています演技の時間枠にはキルチャーが\"イエローストーン\"で働いた数ヶ月も含まれています\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n时间框架还包括基尔彻在《黄石》中工作的几个月，尽管这位演员声称她因伤太重而无法工作。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The battery life is terrible on the one I bought on Amazon.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nバッテリーの寿命は、私がAmazonで買ったものにひどいです。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我在亚马逊上购买的电池续航时间太差了。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: It's only out of this shipment that I am having this issue.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n私がこの問題を抱えているのは、この出荷のうちだけだ。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n私がこの問題を抱えているのは、この出荷の外だけです。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: \"We also wish to restate that the NSPMC has the capacity and enough materials to produce the required indent of the Naira.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n「我々はまた、NSPMCにはナイラに必要な窪みを形成する能力と十分な材料があることを改めて述べておきたい。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n“我们还想重申，NSPMC有能力和足够的材料来生产所需的奈拉缩进。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The statement from Prigozhin, a millionaire who has close links to Russian President Vladimir Putin and was dubbed \"Putin's chef\" for his lucrative Kremlin catering contracts, marked a recognition of the difficulties that the Kremlin has faced in the campaign, which it initially expected to wrap up within weeks when Russian troops invaded Ukraine on Feb. 24.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nJavaScriptの設定を変更する方法はこちら米ロ首脳がオンライン会談バイデン氏、ウクライナ問題で「強い」措置警告12/8(水)7:33配信316米ホワイトハウスで、ロシアのウラジーミル・プーチン大統領とのオンライン会談に臨むジョー・バイデン大統領(右端)。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n与俄罗斯总统弗拉基米尔·普京关系密切的百万富翁普里戈任的声明标志着对克里姆林宫在竞选中面临的困难的认识，最初预计在几周内完成俄罗斯军队入侵乌克兰2月24日。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 蒲田インソーシャル- トリップアドバイザー\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nMy name is Tanja, a social travel advisor.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nKamata Inn Social - TripAdvisor\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I plan to go there, but we need a backup person.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n私はそこに行くつもりだが、バックアップ要員が必要だ。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我计划去那里，但我们需要一个备份人员。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 貴重な日本刀などが展示された「刀剣鑑賞展２０２３」が１２日まで、県立いわき公園内の市暮らしの伝承郷で開かれている。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThe \"Swords and Sword Exhibition 2023\", which exhibited precious Japanese swords and other items, was held in the city's traditional living area in the Kawaki park until December.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nThe Sword Appreciation Exhibition 2023, which displays valuable Japanese swords and other artifacts, is being held until the 12th at Iwaki City's Densho Village in Iwaki Park.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 外来種で、繁殖力が非常に強い雑草として知られています\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nIt's an invasive species, known as a very fertile weed.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIt is an outpatient species, and is known as a weed with very strong fertility.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: エアコンの送風って室外機が回らないのですか？\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nDoes the air conditioner blow off the outside machine?\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nDoes the outdoor unit not turn when the air conditioner is blowing?\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 俳優が朗読してるのは、楽です、、\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nIt's easy for an actor to read aloud.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIt's easy for the actors to read aloud...\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Have had probs with Hockey Balls.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nホッケーボールで問題を起こしたことがあります。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nホッケーボールで問題がありました。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: It has to be taken away one day.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nそれはいつか取り除かれなければなりません。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n总有一天它必须被带走。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: So, you want to provide these people with inputs and outputs as the first testing approach, which has already been done.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nそのため、これらの人々に最初のテストアプローチとして入力と出力を提供したいと考えています。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nこれはすでに実施されています. この方法は,\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 2) The controller's directional joystick and buttons wear out very quickly.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n2) コントローラーの方向ジョイスティックとボタンはすぐに摩耗します。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n2) 控制器的指向控制棒和按很快就会磨损\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Budeme doplňovat písmenka.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nМи будемо доповнювати листи.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nМи будемо доповнювати букви.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: That vessel is off-limits.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nその船は接触禁止だ\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nあの船は立ち入り禁止だ。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Also please refrain from telling me that google/flutter apps suck on iOS and macOS.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n此外，请不要告诉我谷歌/ flutter应用程序在iOS和macOS上很糟糕。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n另外,请不要告诉我谷歌/flutter应用程序吸吮iOS和macOS.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: So, it will be really multi-speaker sentences, and therefore the robustness to the different accents of these speakers could be also improved.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nしたがって、それは本当にマルチスピーカーの文になります。したがって、これらのスピーカーのさまざまなアクセントに対する堅牢性も向上する可能性があります。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n因此, 话语的语音可以更牢固地与不同口音对抗.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Perhaps one of the most notorious is the odd standard that holds that publicly admitting errors is a sign of weakness and that politicians should go to comical lengths to avoid doing so.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n也许最臭名昭著的标准之一是一种奇怪的标准，该标准认为公开承认错误是软弱的表现，政治家应该竭尽全力避免这样做。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n也许最臭名昭著的是一种奇怪的标准，即公开承认错误是软弱的表现，政治家们应该尽其所能，甚至不惜滑稽地避免这样做。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: １４日まで、県内菓子店１０店舗を含む約４０ブランド４５０種類を販売している。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nAs of 14 December, the company sells about 40 brands and 450 varieties of sweets, including 10 sweets shops in the prefecture.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nUntil the 14th, it sells 450 kinds of confectionery from about 40 brands, including 10 confectionery stores in the prefecture.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Unfortunately only had it a week and opened the one door and it cracked the top of the wood piece!\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n扉が\"つ開いたが木の上部は割れた!\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n残念ながら1週間しか持たず、1つのドアを開けたら木片の上部にひびが入ってしまいました!\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Used two over the last couple of years, about one a year, and they worked okay.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n在过去的几年里使用了两个，大约一年一个，它们工作正常。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n在过去的几年里用了两个，大约一年，他们工作得很好。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Some programmers: \"Typing speed does not matter!\"\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n一部のプログラマー: 「タイピングスピードは問題ない! 」\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n一些程序员:\"打字速度并不重要!\"\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 3年ぶりに試食が復活したバレンタインデー向けのチョコレート売り場＝2月9日、福井県福井市の西武福井店\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThe first time in three years that the tasting was resumed was at the February 9th chocolate sale for Valentine's Day at the Shizuoka Fuki shop in Fuki City, Fuki Prefecture.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nOn February 9, the Seibu Fukui branch in Fukui City, Fukui Prefecture, held a chocolate tasting event for Valentine's Day.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: But when the snow began to melt, the culvert started to flood, trapping the bear in deep snow and ice, according to the department.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n同署によると、雪が溶け始めると暗渠が浸水し始め、クマは深い雪と氷に閉じ込められた。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nしかし、雪が溶け始めたとき、カルバートは深い雪と氷にクマを閉じ込めて洪水にかかり始めました。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 市の事業は既に終了しており、県事業への登録も昨年１２月２日に削除されている。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThe city's business has already been closed, and the registration for the prefecture's business was removed on December 2 last year.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nThe project of the city has already ended, and the registration of the prefectural project was also deleted on December 2 last year.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: However, with heavier sweater or sweatshirt, it should be fine.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n虽然我认为这应该是个好选择.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n然而，如果穿上较厚的毛衣或运动衫，应该就没问题了。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 1. varianta : omluvenka – žák je po nemoci, necvičí (je ve výuce)\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n1. варіант: картка з вибаченнями-учень хворий, не займається спортом (знаходиться на заняттях)\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n1 - й варіант: Вибачення - учень після хвороби, не тренується (знаходиться на заняттях)\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Very disappointing since my return window has expired.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n返品期限が切れているので、とても残念です。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n私の帰りのウィンドウが期限切れになっているので、非常に残念。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Of those the Gumdrop is about the best, but it has some serious issues.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nその中で、Gumdrop はほぼ最高ですが、いくつかの深刻な問題があります。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n其中 Gumdrop 是最好的，但它有一些严重的问题。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: ヘナヘナや破けそうな感じではなく、ぴったりめなニーハイブーツでもブーツイン出来てスッキリさせる事は出来ました。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nAnd I could make a bootin' that didn't look like a henna or a broken one, but just the right kind of bootin' that would make it look smooth.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIt was not like a henna henna or a break, but it was possible to boot in even a tight knee-high boots and it was able to make it refreshing.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: It takes the state's governor.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nそれは州知事を取ります。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n这需要该州的州长。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: また、文科省が今春の新学期から、学校教育活動全般でマスク着用を求めない方針を固めたことについては慎重な声が聞かれた。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThere were also some cautious voices about the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology's policy of not requiring students to wear masks in all school educational activities from this spring's new semester.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIt was also heard that the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology has tightened its policy not to require the wearing of masks in all school activities from the new school year this spring.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The video showed girls throwing a drink at the teen, then kicking and dragging her down school hallways.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nビデオには、女子生徒が10代の女性に飲み物を投げつけ、学校の廊下を蹴ったり引きずったりする様子が映っていた。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nビデオは、女の子が10代に飲み物を投げてから、学校の廊下を蹴って引きずっているのを示しました。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I ordered from this company because I've bought it previous seasons and it worked great for us.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nこの会社に注文したのは、前のシーズンに購入したことがあり、とてもうまくいったからです。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n前のシーズンに購入したことがあるので、この会社に注文しました。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: As the car changes, so does Arnie, whose newfound confidence turns to arrogance behind the wheel of his exotic beauty.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n随着汽车的变化，阿尼也变了，他新找到的自信变成了他异国情调美丽背后的傲慢。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n随着汽车的变化，阿尼也是如此，他新发现的自信变成了异国情调的美丽背后的傲慢。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The issue is there are fewer cases available for the Tab A 10.1 w S pen.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n問題は、タブA 10.1 w Sペンの使用可能なケースが少なくなることです。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n问题是Tab A 10.1 w S笔的可用案例较少。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: However, I hate classes on fine arts and literature, and my school history bears it out.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nしかし、私は美術や文学の授業が大嫌いで、私の学校の歴史がそれを証明している。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n然而，我讨厌美术和文学课，我的学校历史证明了这一点。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: It never went away, so I had to return it.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n消えたわけじゃないから返したんだ\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n消えることはなかったので、返却しなければなりませんでした。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Don't doesn't even do anything about it you know they just let the hackers do whatever they want and then they do know that the game is terrible but they're doing absolutely nothing about it and the game keeps on doing updates about their characters really what they should be updating is the physics because it's terrible don't buy this game the physics are terrible and mechanics are terrible the people that obviously the people that built this game was high or something because it's one of the worst games I've honestly ever played in my life I would rather play Pixel Games in this crap it's one of the worst games don't buy\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nそれについて何もしないでくださいあなたは彼らがハッカーに彼らが望むことを何でもさせたことを知っています、そして彼らはゲームがひどいことを知っていますが、彼らはそれについて全く何もしていません、そしてゲームは彼らのキャラクターについて更新し続けます本当に彼らが更新すべきものはそれがひどいので物理学ですこのゲームを買わないでください物理学はひどいですそして力学はひどいです明らかに人々である人々このゲームを構築したのは、私が人生で正直にプレイした中で最悪のゲームの1つであるため、高かったか何かでした私はむしろこのがらくたでPixelゲームをプレイしたいと思いますそれは購入しない最悪のゲームの1つです\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n甚至没有采取任何行动，你知道他们只是让黑客为所欲为，然后他们确实知道游戏很糟糕，但他们绝对没有采取任何行动，并且游戏继续对其进行更新角色真正应该更新的是物理，因为它太糟糕了，不要买这个游戏，物理很糟糕，机制也很糟糕，显然，构建这个游戏的人很高或其他什么，因为这是我最糟糕的游戏之一。老实说，我一生中玩过，我宁愿玩像素游戏，这是最糟糕的游戏之一，不要买\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Discovered the hard way that in 2023, local TV station web sites are the absolute worst experience on the internet.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n苦手な道に辿り着いたのです 2023年,地元テレビ局のウェブサイトは\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n2023年、地方テレビ局のウェブサイトはインターネット上で最悪の体験であることを痛感した。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I own a Pampered Chef small scoop, but am in between residences so most of my 'stuff' is in storage.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n私はパンパードシェフの小さなスクープを持っていますが、住居と住居の間にいるため、私の「もの」のほとんどは保管庫にあります。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n这就是为什么我们现在需要在新的一年里,\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: \"The people of Knowsley are not bigots and are welcoming to people escaping from some of the most dangerous places in the world in search of a place of safety,\" he said.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n肯斯利的人民不是偏执派,\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n\"他说：\"诺斯利人民并不偏执，他们欢迎从世界上一些最危险的地方逃出来寻找安全之地的人们。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: There have been a lot of signs of more rodents this past month or so, which has been exceptionally surprising as it's spring and I would have thought they would venture outdoors with the change in weather.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nここ 1 か月ほど、げっ歯類が増えている兆候がたくさんありました。春なので、天気の変化に合わせてげっ歯類が屋外に出かけるだろうと思っていたので、これは非常に驚くべきことでした。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n在过去的一个月左右的时间里，有很多啮齿动物增多的迹象，这非常令人惊讶，因为现在是春天，我本以为随着天气的变化，它们会冒险到户外去。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: ハタケニラは、食べられませんのでご注意ください\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nPlease note that you cannot eat Japanese leeks\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nPlease note that you cannot eat Hata kenira\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: ファイアーエムブレム聖戦の系譜について。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nAbout the genealogy of the Fire Emblem Crusade.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nOn the genealogy of the Fire Emblem Holy War.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: または、Windows10に入っているソフトでできますか？\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nOr is it possible with software that is in Windows 10?\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nOr, can it be done with the software included in Windows 10?\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: They pushed Adriana into red lockers lining the school hallways and one of the girls in a pink shirt punched Kuch repeatedly.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nピンクシャツの女の子の\"人がカッチに繰り返し打った.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n他们把阿德里亚娜推到学校走廊里的红色储物柜上，一个穿粉红色衬衫的女孩一遍又一遍地打库奇。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 家の中の掃除を、マメにやらなくなってしまいます。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nMommy will no longer do the cleaning in the house.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nYou will not be able to clean the house.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: ⇒国公立大出願の最終日集計\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n⇒ Total number of final day applications for national and public universities\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n⇒ The final day of applications for national and public universities is subsumed.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: As the car changes, so does Arnie, whose newfound confidence turns to arrogance behind the wheel of his exotic beauty.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n車が変わるにつれて、その新しい自信は彼のエキゾチックな美しさの車輪の後ろの傲慢さに変わります。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n新しい自信が傲慢さに変わります異様な美しさが変貌するほどです\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: You can turn the plug upside down so that the thumb screws are on the underside of the baffle, but it will take you hours to turn those screws; no tool will do it, and only the tiniest fingers would have an easy time of it.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nつまみネジがバッフルの下側になるようにプラグを逆さまにすることができますが、それらのネジを回すのに数時間かかります。どんな道具もそれをしません、そして最も小さな指だけがそれを簡単にするでしょう。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n親指ねじがバッフルの下側にあるようにプラグを逆さまにすることができますが、それらのネジを回すのに数時間かかります。ツールはそれを行いません、そして最も小さな指だけがそれを簡単にするでしょう。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I'm not sure if there's something not compatible or if this is just poorly made, but I'm not going to sit and hold my device in while it charges.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n我不知道它是否不兼容,\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我不确定是不是有什么不兼容的地方，还是这个东西就是做得很糟糕，但我不打算坐着一直握着我的设备让它充电。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The experience having to follow directions was far superior on Apple Maps compared to Google Maps.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nGoogle マップに比べて Apple Mapsの経験はずっと上でした\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n指示に従わなければならない経験は、Googleマップと比較してAppleマップではるかに優れていました。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: There's another way: In Bailout, Neil Barofsky's memoir of his time in Washington serving as the special inspector general overseeing the Troubled Asset Relief Program, he described the advice he received from Kristine Belisle, the woman he smartly hired to be his communications director.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n別の方法もあります。ニール・バロフスキー氏がワシントンで問題資産救助プログラムを監督する特別監督官を務めたときの回想録『Bailout』では、賢くコミュニケーションディレクターとして雇った女性、クリスティーナ・ベライル氏から受けたアドバイスについて説明しています。バロフスキー氏は、コミュニケーションディレクターとして賢く雇った女性、クリスティーナ・ベライル氏にとってはコミュニケーションディレクターであるため、賢く受けたアドバイスについて説明しています。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n还有另一种方式：在《救助》中，尼尔·巴罗夫斯基回忆了他在华盛顿担任特别检察长监督困境资产救助计划的时光，他描述了他从克里斯汀·贝利斯尔那里得到的建议，他聪明地雇佣了她作为他的通讯主任。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Proboha, v každém národě jsou lidé dobří i zlí.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nБоже, в кожній нації є люди хороші і погані.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nНа Бога, в кожному народі є люди добрі та злі.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Every artist has been there, made the same mistakes.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nすべてのアーティストがそこにいて、同じ間違いを犯したことがあります。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nどのアーティストも同じ過ちを犯した\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 使用後に破けていることもありませんでした。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nIt was not torn after use and was not torn after use.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIt has never broken after use.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Yet, unimaginable fear, terror and displacement have left them with the invisible scar of trauma.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n让他们留下一个看不见的创伤痕迹.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n然而，难以想象的恐惧、恐怖和流离失所给他们留下了无形的创伤。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 2) The controller's directional joystick and buttons wear out very quickly.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n2) コントローラーの方向ジョイスティックとボタンはすぐに摩耗します。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n2)控制器的定向操纵杆和按钮磨损非常快。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: So, I put a word into a bag.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nだから、私は袋に単語を入れました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n所以，我把一个词放进袋子里。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: No idea why.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n不知道为什么。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n不知道为什么。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I don't have a scale to weigh him, but he feels like he's well over a pound.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n体重計は持っていないが、1ポンドは超えているように感じる。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我没有磅秤称它的体重，但感觉它已经超过一磅了。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The prompt this week on Revelations is Stay up all night.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n本周《启示录》的提示是通宵熬夜。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n本周关于启示的提示是熬夜。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: - mitgelieferte Dübel sind viel zu klein und wackeln (hatte keine anderen und habe sie da auch kein Pokal im Haus war, mit Bastelkleber festgeklebt) - die Halterungen für den Einlegeboden wackeln etwas (habs mit etwas Papier umwickelt und ausgeglichen) Fazit: Wenn er nicht so gut aussehen würde und so gute Maße hätte, würde ich weniger Sterne geben, da man sich alles passend machen muss, um wirklich zufrieden zu sein. Außerdem finde Ich ihn dann dafür auch etwas zu teuer.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n- supplied dowels are much too small and wobble ( had no others and have them since no cup was in the house, glued with craft glue) - the holders for the shelf wobble a bit ( I wrapped it with some paper and balanced it) Conclusion: If it didn't look so good and had such good dimensions, I would give less stars, because you have to make everything fit to be really satisfied, because you have to make everything fit to be really satisfied. Also, I think that it is a bit too expensive for this purpose as well.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n- included dowels are much too small and wobble (I didn't have any others and I didn't have them because there wasn't a trophy in the house, stuck with craft glue) - the brackets for the shelf wobble a bit (I wrapped it with a little paper and balanced it out) Conclusion: If it didn't look so good and had such good dimensions, I would give it less stars because you have to make everything fit to be really satisfied. I also find it a bit too expensive for that.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: It's totally worth it!\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nそれは完全に価値があります!\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n価値はある!\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: So, the context is like in one <unintelligible/> together with sentence we actually want to translate.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nつまり、文脈は翻訳したい文と一緒に<意味不明/>にあるようなものだ。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n在一个词里我们需要翻译的句子.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: And we need to collect it, prepare it manually, create it somewhat.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nそして、私たちはそれを収集し、手動で準備し、やや作成する必要があります。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我们需要收集它，手动准备它，创建它。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: でも他の指に使う分には良いと思います。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nBut I think it's good for other fingers.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nBut I think it's good for using it on other fingers.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The time frame also includes several months when Kilcher worked on \"Yellowstone,\" despite the actor's claims that she was too injured to work.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n時間枠には、キルヒャーが怪我をして働けなかったという俳優の主張にもかかわらず、「イエローストーン」に取り組んだ数か月も含まれています。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n時間枠には、キルヒャーが「イエローストーン」に取り組んだ数ヶ月も含まれていますが、俳優の主張にもかかわらず、彼女は怪我をして仕事をしていませんでした。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: We have already offered mental health and psychosocial support.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n精神保健や心理社会支援を提供してきました\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n私たちは既に精神衛生的、心理社会的な支援を提供している。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 野村不動産グループ×JR東日本グループ開発エリア【MEGURO MARC】の32階建タワー。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nA 32-story tower in the Nomura Real Estate Group x JR East Group development area [MEGURO MARC].\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nNomura Real Estate Group x JR East Group Development Area [MEGURO MARC] 32F building tower.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: These roots are hidden.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n这些根是隐藏的。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n这些根是隐藏的。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Jedná se o významné archeologické místo.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nЦе важлива археологічна пам'ятка.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nЦе важливе археологічне місце.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Deport the white supremacists.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n白人至上主義者を追放しろ\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n驱逐白人至上主义者。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: So, I plan to do it myself.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nだから、自分でやるつもりです。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n所以，我打算自己做。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Very worth the money!\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nお金を払う価値は十分にあります!\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n非常值得的钱!\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Over time dart became my go-to for quick UI.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n随着时间的推移，Dart 成为了我快速创建用户界面的首选。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n随着时间的推移，dart 成为了我快速 UI 的首选。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: But I'm not sure whether we have some test data for that, but we might try to play around with the models with some sort of style transfer?\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nしかし、そのためのテストデータがあるのかどうかわかりませんが、何らかのスタイル変換でモデルをいじってみるかも?\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nしかし、そのためのテストデータがあるかどうかはわかりませんが、何らかのスタイル転送でモデルをいじってみるかもしれません。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 4路線利用できる‘目黒’駅に誕生。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nBorn at 'Meguro' station where 4 lines can be used.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nBorn at 'Meguro' Station where 4 lines can be used.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I'd hate to base my business on tech from Google, to be honest, on the other hand Google is one of the few big players with real incentives to create a compelling cross platform experience and it shows.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n正直なところ、Googleは魅力的なクロスプラットフォーム体験を創造する真のインセンティブを持つ数少ない大手企業の1つです。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n正直なところ、Googleの技術をビジネスに活かしたいのですが、Googleは魅力的なクロスプラットフォームエクスペリエンスを生み出す真のインセンティブを持つ数少ない大手企業の1つであり、それが示しています。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: To success, the realization of dreams, friendship, to the simple but true!!\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n成功へ、夢の実現、友情、シンプルだが真実へ!!\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n为了成功，实现梦想，友谊，简单而真实！！\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: カピバラは世界最大級のネズミの仲間で、指の間に水かきがあり泳ぎが得意。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThe capybara is the world's largest rat companion, with a water drop between its fingers and an excellent swimmer.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nThe capybara is one of the world's largest rats, and has a webbed between his fingers and is good at swimming.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: - mitgelieferte Dübel sind viel zu klein und wackeln (hatte keine anderen und habe sie da auch kein Pokal im Haus war, mit Bastelkleber festgeklebt) - die Halterungen für den Einlegeboden wackeln etwas (habs mit etwas Papier umwickelt und ausgeglichen) Fazit: Wenn er nicht so gut aussehen würde und so gute Maße hätte, würde ich weniger Sterne geben, da man sich alles passend machen muss, um wirklich zufrieden zu sein. Außerdem finde Ich ihn dann dafür auch etwas zu teuer.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n- Supplied dowels are much too small and wobble (had no other and have them since no cup was in the house, glued with craft glue) - the brackets for the shelf wobble a bit (habs with some paper wrapped and balanced) Conclusion: If he would not look so good and have such good dimensions, I would give fewer stars, because you have to make everything fit to be really satisfied. In addition, I find him then also a little too expensive.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n- included dowels are much too small and wobble (I didn't have any others and I didn't have them because there wasn't a trophy in the house, stuck with craft glue) - the brackets for the shelf wobble a bit (I wrapped it with a little paper and balanced it out) Conclusion: If it didn't look so good and had such good dimensions, I would give it less stars because you have to make everything fit to be really satisfied. I also find it a bit too expensive for that.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I like some of the translations. I was really amazed, even though you could see that the model made mistakes on its first try, it really wanted to make some kind of correction.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nいくつかの訳は好きだね。そのモデルは一回目で誤訳をしてるけど、本当に何らかの訂正をしようとしていることに感心した。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n有些翻译我觉得很好. 我非常惊,\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: It's weird doing weightlifting but also having no real clue what your one-rep-max is, cus that's one of the key ways people track their progress.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nそれは奇妙な重量挙げをやっているだけでなく、あなたのone-rep-maxが何であるか、人々が彼らの進歩を追跡する重要な方法の一つだcus本当の手がかりを持\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n举重很奇怪,但却对自己的一个反复率没有真正的把握.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I was fortunate enough to spend a memorable six months alongside Nicholas in 2011 supporting a range of projects.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n2011年には、ニコラスと共に様々なプロジェクトをサポートすることができ、記憶に残る半年を過ごすことができました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n六个月的时间,\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: NENECHÁVEJTE ŽÁDNÝ NÁBYTEK ANI ODPADKY V CHODBÁCH!\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nНе залишайте ні в чому нерухомість або відходів на сходах!\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nНЕ ВІДПОВІДАЙТЕ ЖОДНИХ НАБИТКІВ ТА ОТДІЛІВ У ХОРБАХ!\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: However, I hate classes on fine arts and literature, and my school history bears it out.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n但是，我不喜欢美术和文学课，我的求学历程可以证明这一点。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n然而，我讨厌美术和文学课，我的学校历史证明了这一点。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: But gentling despair at our messiness is crucial - because it gives us more space to tackle the ruins all around.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nしかし、私たちの混乱に絶望を穏やかにすることは重要です-それは私たちに周りの遺跡に取り組むためのより多くのスペースを与えるからです。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n而至关重要的是，要避免对我们的邋遢表现出绝望——因为它会给予我们更多空间去处理周围的废墟。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I ordered from this company because I've bought it previous seasons and it worked great for us.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n私は前のシーズンを購入したので、この会社に注文しました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我之所以从这家公司订购，是因为我之前的季节购买过，对我们来说效果很好。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: しまじろうのわおはテレビ東京では日曜日ですか？\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nIs Shimajiro no Wao a Sunday in TV Tokyo?\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIs Shimajiro no Wao on Sunday in TV Tokyo?\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.