Split (1)

train · 270k rows

messages listlengths 3 3
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I bench press on my bed.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nベンチプレスでベッドで練習する\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n私はベッドでベンチプレスをします。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 無料で体験レッスン。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nFree and trial lessons.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nTry a lesson for free.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I'm BACK baby!\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nI'mbackbaby!\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我回来了，宝贝！\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Mr. Oldman has played and created many, different characters.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nミスター、オールドマン氏は、さまざまなキャラクターを演じ、作成してきました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nオールドマン氏は多くの異なるキャラクターを演じてきた。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The Hoops pushed to reduced terms in the second half but Ruaidhri Higgins' charges stood firm to win the curtain-raiser.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nフープは後半戦に戦力を落としたが、ルアイドリ・ヒギンズの攻撃は勝利に貢献した。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n篮球在下半场被削减了条款，但Ruaidhri Higgins的指控坚定地赢得了帷幕提升者。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Two adults came in to break up the attack, with one adult pulling the teens apart.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n人の大人が襲撃を止めに入り、1人の大人が10代の若者たちを引き離した。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n两个大人进来阻止了袭击，其中一个大人把孩子们拉开。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Comes with a cover and while it may not have much functional use, it really keeps it looking sharp.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nカバーが付属しており、機能的な用途はあまりないかもしれませんが、シャープな外観を保ちます。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nカバーが付いており、あまり機能的ではないかもしれませんが、本当にシャープに見えます。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: And then, in the subsequent years, it was integrated with normal like there were also PBML issues which mixed empty margin papers and separate papers because of the number of those papers.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n然后，在随后的几年里，它与正常的融合，就像也有PBML问题一样，由于这些论文的数量，混合了空边距论文和单独的论文。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n然后，在随后的几年里，它与正常的PBML合并，就像也有PBML问题一样，由于这些文件的数量，这些文件混合了空页纸和单独的文件。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 県と一関市は１０日、旅行者らの宿泊代金を割り引くそれぞれの補助金交付事業で、ベリーノホテル一関（同市山目）が２０２１年１０月から約１年にわたって不適切な利用を行っていたと発表した。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nOn the 10th, the prefecture and Ichinoseki City announced that Bellino Hotel Ichinoseki ( Yamame, the same city) had been improperly using their respective subsidy programs to discount the accommodation fees of travelers for about a year from October 2021 onwards.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nThe prefecture and Ichiseki City announced on the 10th that Berino Hotel Ichiseki (Yamamee City) had been making improper use of the hotel for about a year from October 2021, in their respective subsidy programs to reduce the cost of accommodation for travelers.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Forget me, fine.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n私を忘れて、大丈夫。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n忘掉我，好。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: And so, we brought up, again, there's a lot of concern I share about what will happen when Title 42 ends in May and so, making sure that the federal government has a plan.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nタイトル42が5月に終わるとどうなるかについて改めて考えました連邦政府は計画を立てています\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nそして、5月に42号が終了したときに何が起こるのか、連邦政府に計画があるのかどうか、多くの懸念があります。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Klidně ti zavolám ať to neplatíš\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nЯ вам одразу передзвоню, щоб не платити\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nЯ тобі зателефоную, але не варто.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: また、付属のチューブと機械と繋ぐ部分がチューブに入るのか心配でしたが押しこむ形で入りました😂 軽量なので持ち運びは楽だと思います！\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nAnd also I was worried that the attached tube and the machine parts would be in the tube, but it was in a stuffy way.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nAlso, I was worried about whether the attached tube and the part that connects to the machine would fit into the tube, but it came in a push shape 😂 It's lightweight, so I think it's easy to carry around!\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Gegen 21 Uhr fuhr der 25-Jährige mit seinem Audi auf der Kreisstraße Richtung Hailfingen und kam aus bislang ungeklärter Ursache in einer Linkskurve nach rechts von der Fahrbahn ab, so der Polizeibericht. Dabei beschädigte der Audi einen Leitpfosten, prallte seitlich gegen einen Baum und blieb einige Meter entfernt stehen. Durch die Kollision wurde der Fahrer in seinem Auto eingeklemmt. Die Feuerwehr befreite ihn mit schwerem Gerät. Der Rettungsdienst brachte den Schwerverletzten in ein Krankenhaus. Da der Verdacht auf Fahruntüchtigkeit bestand, wurde die Entnahme einer Blutprobe angeordnet. Am Audi entstand laut Polizeibericht Totalschaden in Höhe von 1000 Euro.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nAbout 21.00 the 25-year-old drove in his Audi on the ring road towards Hailfingen and came off of the road in a left turn to the right for an unexplained cause, according to the police report. The Audi damaged a guide post, laterally bumped against a tree and stopped some meters away. The collision trapped the driver in his car. The firefighters released him with a heavy device. The rescue service took the seriously injured to a hospital. Since the suspicion of drunk driving was, a blood sample was ordered. According to the police report the Audi caused a fatality damage in the amount of 1000 euros.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nAt around 9 pm, the 25-year-old drove his Audi on the district road towards Hailfingen and turned right off the road in a left turn to the right, according to the police report. The Audi damaged a guide post, hit the side of a tree and stopped a few meters away. As a result of the collision, the driver was trapped in his car. The fire department freed him with heavy equipment. The emergency services took the seriously injured person to a hospital. Since there was a suspicion of incapacity to drive, a blood sample was ordered to be taken. According to the police report, the Audi suffered a total loss of 1000 euros.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Svému týmu hned vysílačkou hlásil, že se mu zasekl plynový pedál.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nПо радіо він повідомив, що у нього застрягла педаль газу.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nВін одразу повідомив своїй команді по радіо, що у нього застрягла педаль газу.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: ハタケニラは、食べられませんのでご注意ください\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nIt's not edible, so be careful.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nPlease note that you cannot eat Hata kenira\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 皆様は、面白いと思いますか？\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nDo you think it's funny?\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nDo you find it interesting?\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: So, I see this fair as an important possible source of non-native English speech that we can use to extend the test set.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nですから、このフェアは、テストセットを拡張するために使用できる、非ネイティブの英語スピーチの重要な可能な情報源だと思います。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n所以，我认为这是一个重要的非英语母语语音的可能来源，我们可以用它来扩展测试集。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: A hrozí, že to ten druhý špatně pochopí.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nІ загроза, що другий зрозуміє це неправильно.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nІ є загроза, що останній неправильно це зрозуміє.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: But I feel somehow I started this instance on the wrong foot, so to speak.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nしかし、私はどういうわけかこのインスタンスを間違った足で始めたように感じます。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n但我觉得我从错误的角度开始了这个例子，可以这么说。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: It took a while to warm up to Grady\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nグレディに暖まるのに時間がかかった\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nGradyのところまでウォームアップするのに少し時間がかかりました\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: B-Ware als Neuware Verkauft\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nB-commodities sold as new\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nB-stock sold as new\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Most definitely\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n間違いなく\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n非常肯定\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 毎年８０人前後がカットを受ける。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nAbout 80 people get cut every year.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nAbout 80 people receive cuts every year.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 六波羅探題が滅びたとの知らせを聞いた時治の家来たちはとたんに逃げ出し、残ったのは２０人ほどだけ。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nUpon hearing the news of the destruction of the Six Wave Project, the members of the family fled and only about 20 survived.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nWhen they heard the news that the search for the Rokuhara had been destroyed, the family members immediately fled, and only about 20 remained.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: How do we plug that in?\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nどうやって接続するの？\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n“怎么招?\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Days later, Balenciaga released a statement apologizing for the photos and outlining the changes it would implement to avoid similar \"mistakes\" in the future.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n数日後、バレンシアガは写真について謝罪し、将来同様の「間違い」を回避するために実装する変更を概説する声明を発表しました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n几天后，Balenciaga发布了一份声明，为这些照片道歉，并概述了它将实施的更改，以避免将来出现类似的\"错误\"。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Jedním z projevů loajality s režimem byla účast na státem organizovaných oslavách.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nОдним із проявів лояльності до режиму була участь у організованих державою урочистостях.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nОдним з проявів була участь у організованих державою урочистостях.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Im Sommer 2026 richtet Mexiko gemeinsam mit den USA und Kanada die WM mit dann erstmals 48 Mannschaften aus. Cocca tritt die Nachfolge von Gerardo Martino an, dessen Vertrag nach dem frühen WM-Aus in Katar nicht verlängert wurde. Der 50-Jährige zählte bis vor wenigen Tagen nicht zu den Favoriten für den Posten. Er hatte erst im November als Coach des mexikanischen Clubs Tigres übernommen. Seine überraschende Berufung zum Nationaltrainer löste Ärger im Verein aus.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nIn the summer of 2026, Mexico co-hosted the World Cup with the United States and Canada with 48 teams for the first time.Cocca succeeds Gerardo Martino, whose contract was not renewed after the early World Cup exit in Qatar.The 50-year-old was not a favorite for the position until a few days ago.He had only taken over as coach of the Mexican club Tigres in November.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIn the summer of 2026, Mexico will host the World Cup together with the USA and Canada, which will include 48 teams for the first time. Cocca takes over from Gerardo Martino, whose contract was not extended after the premature World Cup exit in Qatar. Up until a few days ago, the 50-year-old was not considered a favorite for the position. He had just taken over as a coach for the Mexican Tigres Club in November. His surprising appointment as national team trainer sparked anger among the team.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: So, when some session is happening, we need the names and terminology for that session.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nそのため、何らかのセッションが発生すると、そのセッションの名前と用語が必要になります。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nそのため、あるセッションが発生しているときには、そのセッションの名前と用語が必要です。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: For example, there were just shy of 7,000 citizens from South American countries in 2022, while there was a smidge over 3,000 nationals hailing from North and Central America.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n例えば 2022年には南米の国々から来た市民は 7,000人弱で北米と中米から来た市民は 3,000人弱でした\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n例えば 2022年には南米の国々から 7,000人の市民が恥ずかしがり屋でしたが北米と中央アメリカから 3,000人以上の国民が来ていました\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: \"DHS will continue prioritizing its work to protect our country from terrorism, respond to natural disasters, and secure our borders while responding appropriately to the over 70 Congressional committees and subcommittees that have oversight of DHS.\"\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n\"国土安全部将继续优先保护我们的国家免受恐怖主义,应对自然灾害,并保护我们的边界,\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n“DHS 将继续优先考虑保护我们的国家免受恐怖主义袭击、应对自然灾害和保护我们的边境，同时对监督 DHS 的 70 多个国会委员会和小组委员会做出适当回应。”\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Contact our Salesforce Consultants today!\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n今すぐセールスフォースコンサルタントにお問い合わせください!\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n今すぐ Salesforce コンサルタントにお問い合わせください。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: #Robecofirm#geologist #entrepreneurship #sustainability #success #friendship #toast #dreams\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n# Robecofirm#地質学者# entrepreneurship# sustainability# success# friendship# toast# dreams# toast# toast# dreams.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n#Robecofirm#地质学家 #创业精神 #可持续性 #成功 #友谊 #祝酒 #梦想\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 「親愛なる内閣総理大臣さま『命の防波堤』東尋坊から」このタイトルで１０冊目の本を自費出版しました。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n\"dear Prime Minister\" Breakwater of Life \"from Tojinbo\" I have self-published my 10th book under this title.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n\"Dear Prime Minister, 'Bulwark of Life' from Tojinbo\" I have self-published my tenth book under this title.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 約６年半ぶりに復活したシルバーカラーの山形新幹線「つばさ」＝１１日午前、ＪＲ山形駅\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThe Silver-colored Shinjuku Mountain Line, revived after about six and a half years.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nThe silver-colored Yamagata Shinkansen \"Tsubasa,\" which has been revived after about six and a half years, at JR Yamagata Station on the morning of the 11th.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Well, going back to the automatic evaluation, the problem with mismatch is that the output is correctly inflected, but the context is different.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nさて、自動評価に戻りますが、ミスマッチの問題は、出力が正しく反映されているが、文脈が異なることです。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n问题在于输出正确的折叠, 但背景不同.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The replacement pajama my son wore one time, I put it in my washing machine just like always and the zipper broke off!\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n息子が一度着ていた交換用パジャマで、いつものように洗濯機に入れたらジッパーが壊れました！\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我儿子曾经穿过的新睡衣, 我把它放进洗衣机里,\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Yet, unimaginable fear, terror and displacement have left them with the invisible scar of trauma.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nしかし、想像を絶する恐怖、恐怖、避難は彼らに目に見えないトラウマの傷跡を残しました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nしかし想像もできないほどの恐怖や恐怖そして移住が彼らを traumatisingの見えない傷のままにしてきたのです\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 32インチモニターで4分割表示しましたが、撮影サイズを最大にすれば問題ナシです。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nWe showed a 32-inch monitor in four parts. If you can maximize the screen size, it won't be a problem.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nI displayed it in four sections on a 32-inch monitor, but there is no problem if the shooting size is maximized.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Upon closer examination of the coffee pod, I noticed that the code printed on the top of the pod isn't very legible so I can only assume that I have a bad box.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n仔细检查咖啡, 我注意到在顶部打印的代码是不很可读,\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n仔细检查咖啡包后，我注意到咖啡包顶部打印的代码不太清晰，所以我只能假设我的盒子有问题。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Ok case with serious limitations\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n重大な制限を持つOkケース\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n有严重限制的Ok案件\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 中学英文法から対応・初心者も安心。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nFrom junior high school English grammar correspondence - beginners are also safe.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nFrom junior high school English grammar, it is safe for beginners.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 3年ぶりに試食が復活したバレンタインデー向けのチョコレート売り場＝2月9日、福井県福井市の西武福井店\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nChocolate shop for Valentine's Day where tasting has been revived after 3 years = February 9, Seibu Fukui store in Fukui City, Fukui Prefecture\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nOn February 9, the Seibu Fukui branch in Fukui City, Fukui Prefecture, held a chocolate tasting event for Valentine's Day.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Playing around a bit with Flutter.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nフラッターで少し遊んでいます。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n玩了一下颤动。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I know it's not my machine because other pods I try work just fine.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n他のポッドを試すと問題なく動作するので、私のマシンが原因ではないことはわかっています。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我知道这不是我的机器，因为我尝试的其他豆荚工作得很好。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Me, in board shorts and a wife beater, and The Domestic Partner, all tatted up and with a new haircut that he himself described as \"making me look like a neo-nazi\".\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n私はボードショーツと妻のビーター、そしてTheDomesticPartnerで、彼自身が「私をネオナチのように見せてくれた」と説明した新しいヘアカットで、すべてタトゥーを入れました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我穿着短裤，殴打妻子，而《家庭伴侣》则全身打扮，留着新发型，他自己形容为“让我看起来像个新纳粹分子”。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Funktion: Ruckzählung um 1 Schritt\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nFunction: counting down by one step\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nFunction: Ruck counts a 1 step\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: And later on, we may do something more about the multi-accent thing.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n後日マルチセントの事柄についてもっと考えてみましょう\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nそして後日、マルチアクセンチュアの件についても何かするかもしれない。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Snímky, které publikoval španělský web Cultura Inquieta, ukazují, jak se žije lidem s mentálním postižení v jednom z tamních \"středisek\".\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nЗображення, опубліковані іспанським веб-сайтом Cultura Inquieta, показують, як люди з інтелектуальними вадами живуть на одному з «курортів» там.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nЗнімки, опубліковані іспанським сайтом Cultura Inquieta, показують, як живуть люди з психічними вадами в одному з тамтешніх \"середовищ.\"\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: \"I don't want to keep picking on the kid but he needs to be relieved of his duties,\" Sherwood told Soccer Saturday.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n\"私はその子に挑み続けたくないが,彼は彼の義務を免除する必要がある\"とシェルウッドはサッカーの土曜日に語った.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n“我不想继续挑剔这个孩子，但他需要解除他的职责，”舍伍德告诉《足球周六》。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 良く出来てますが\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nit's good.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIt can be done well.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Ale chápu, že ses musela hrozně leknout.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nАле я розумію, що ти, мабуть, дуже злякалася.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nРозумію, ти, мабуть, страшно злякалася.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Indické velkoměsto Hajdarábád hostilo poprvé v historii závod formule E. Už páteční tréninky přinesly vážný karambol.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nВ індійському місті Хайдарабад вперше пройшла гонка Формули-Е. вже п'ятничне тренування принесла серйозну карамболу.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nІндійське місто Хайдарабад вперше в історії прийняло гонку Формули Е. П'ятничні тренування принесли серйозний карамбол.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Pedestrian dies in hospital after crash with car in Cowdenbeath as man arrested\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nカウデンビースで車が衝突し、男が逮捕され、歩行者が病院で死亡\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n行人死在医院之后崩溃的汽车在Cowdenbeath为的人被逮捕\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: So, nach aktuellem Stand der Einplanung fahre ich, eventuell, ab September elektrisch. Mal sehen wie oft sich der Bautermin noch verschiebt bis dahin....\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nSo, according to the current state of planning, I will be driving electrically, possibly from September. Let's see how often the construction date is postponed until then....\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nSo, according to the current status of the planning, I may drive electrically from September. see how often the construction date is still postponed until then....\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I was never even able to sucessfully have this phone transferred to my Virgin Mobile account.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nこの電話をVirgin Mobileアカウントに正常に転送することさえできませんでした。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nこの携帯電話をヴァージン・モバイルのアカウントに移行することもできなかった。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I do not know, [PERSON1], do you know about any style transfer data for English Czech? Do we have something?\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nわかりません、[PERSON1] さん、英語チェコ語のスタイル転送データについてご存知ですか?何かありますか？\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n[PERSON1]、英語チェコ語のスタイル転送データについて知っていますか？何かある？\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Second, it doesn't come with a charger.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n第二に、充電器は付属していません。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n其次，它没有带充电器。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: ※被着体、塗料の種類によっては貼り跡やのり残りが発生する場合がありますので、問題がないことを確かめてからご使用下さい。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nPlease note that depending on the type of substrate and paint, there may be traces of adhesive or residue left behind, so please make sure there are no issues before using.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nPlease make sure that there are no problems before use.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: So <parallel_talk> have an explicit list of things which must not appear in the output </parallel_talk>, right?\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nしたがって、<parallel_talk>には、出力</parallel_talk>に表示されてはならないものの明示的なリストがありますよね?\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nしたがって、<parallel_talk>には、出力</parallel_talk>に表示してはならないものの明示的なリストがありますよね？\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I do not know, [PERSON1], do you know about any style transfer data for English Czech? Do we have something?\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n我不知道，[PERSON1 ]，你知道英国捷克人的风格转移数据吗？我们有什么吗？\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我不知道，[PERSON1]，你知道英语捷克语的任何风格转换数据吗？我们有什么吗？\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: A lot of things I order in purple always come too light, too kiddish, too weird, too neon-ish, what have you.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n私が注文する紫色のものの多くは、常に色が薄すぎたり、子供っぽすぎたり、奇妙すぎたり、ネオン色すぎたり、何でもあります。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n私が紫色で注文するものの多くは、いつも軽すぎたり、キディッシュすぎたり、奇妙すぎたり、ネオンっぽすぎたりする。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The controller could do with more durable springs; after a couple months, buttons that are used the most stop responding and the right joystick loses it's centering, IE- makes map screens zoom in and characters walk forwards without even touching the controls.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n制御器はより耐久性の高いスプリングを使うことができます数ヶ月後には最もよく使われるボタンが反応しなくなり右ジョイスティックがセンターをなくし IE-は地図画面を拡大しキャラクターはコントロールに触らずに前進します\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n数ヶ月後、最も使用されているボタンが応答を停止し、右のジョイスティックは、それがセンタリングを失う、すなわち-マップ画面がズームインし、文字\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The 23-year-old was handed his debut by Antonio Conte on Saturday at the King Power Stadium with his side taking the lead after 14 minutes through Rodrigo Bentancur.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n23歳の彼は土曜日にキング・パワー・スタジアムでアントニオ・コンテによってデビューを果たし、ロドリゴ・ベンタンクールを通じて14分後にリードを取った。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n23歳のアントニオ-コンテは土曜日にキング-パワー-スタジアムでデビューし、14分にロドリゴ-ベンタンクールを通過してリードを奪った。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: At the time, we were in the middle of relocating and living in a hotel.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n当時私たちは引っ越し中でした\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n当時、私たちは引っ越しをしてホテルに住んでいた最中でした。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: そうですね。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nYeah.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nThat's right.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Asian Championships is to give new impetus to development of athletics\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nアジア選手権は陸上競技の発展に新たな推進力を与えることです\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nアジア選手権は、陸上競技の発展に新たな推進力を与えることです。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: However its the only drone i have ever had overheating issues with and it actually takes the fun out of flying im going to assume for now that its a manufacturing issue which they need to address asap if they want there product to be successful.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nでも、オーバーヒートの問題を起こしたドローンはこれが初めてで、実際ドローンを飛ばす楽しみが損なわれたんだけど、今のところ、これは製造上の問題だと考えていて、製品をヒットさせたいならば、販売側はすぐに対処する必要があるでしょう。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nしかし、私がこれまでに過熱の問題を抱えていた唯一のドローンであり、実際には、製品を成功させたい場合は、できるだけ早く対処する必要がある製造上の問題であると今のところ想定して、飛行することから楽しみを奪います。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: We can motivate participants to submit.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n参加者に提出を促すことができます。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nWecanmotivate激励participants参与者tosubmit提交.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The Domestic Partner and I went to the liquor store tonight for some beers and a bottle of bub.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nドメスティック・パートナーと私は今夜酒屋にビールとパブのボトルを飲みに行きました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nパートナーと私は今夜、ビールとシャンパンのボトルを買うために酒屋に行きました。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: #Robecofirm#geologist #entrepreneurship #sustainability #success #friendship #toast #dreams\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n#Robecofirm#地質学者#起業家#持続可能性#成功#友情#乾杯#夢\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n#Robecofirm#geologist #entrepreneurship #sustainability #success #friendship #toast #dreams\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 養生テープ弱粘着\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nCuring tape weak adhesive\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nCuring tape, weakly adhesive\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: White nationalists, gun fetishists, pro-dictator right wing.. there's the danger.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n白人至上主義者、銃フェチ、親独裁者右翼…危険はある。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n白人ナショナリスト、銃フェティシスト、独裁者寄りの右翼。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: This can be extremely difficult for those in the healthcare industry, which is why I asked 30 health and wellness professionals the same question: \"How do you manage your energy and not burn out in your profession?\"\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nこれは私が30人の健康および健康の専門家に同じ質問をなぜ尋ねたかであるヘルスケア工業のそれらのために非常に困難である場合もある:\"いかにあなたのエネルギーを管理し、あなたの専門職で燃え尽きないか。\"\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nこれはヘルスケア業界の人々にとって非常に難しい場合があります。そのため、30人の健康とウェルネスの専門家に同じ質問をしました。「どのようにしてエネルギーを管理し、職業で燃え尽きないようにしますか ? 」\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 【沖永良部総局】空き家や空き店舗などをを借りて挑戦したいことがある人の思いを可視化し、貸主を募集する不動産ウェブサービス「さかさま不動産」の沖永良部支局開局イベントが８日、知名町知名のコミュニティースぺース「ｅｎｔａｋｕ」であった。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n[Okinoerabu General Bureau] The Okinoerabu branch office opening event of the real estate web service “Sakasama Real Estate”, which visualizes the thoughts of people who want to take on the challenge of renting vacant houses and stores, and recruits lenders, was held on the 8th in China. It was the community space \"entaku\".\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n【Okinoerabu General Bureau】The Okinoerabu branch office of the real estate web service \"Sakasama Real Estate\" that visualizes the thoughts of people who want to challenge themselves by renting vacant houses and vacant stores and recruits landlords was held on the 8th at the community space \"entaku\" in Tomina Town.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The physics are terrible and the people that created the game won't do anything about it\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n物理学はひどいですし、ゲームを作成した人々はそれについて何もしません\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n物理是可怕的, 创造游戏的人不会做任何事情\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Samotná dějová zápletka nehýří zrovna přílišnou originalitou – jednoduše se musíte na vlastní pást vypořádat s úklady temných sil.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nСюжет сам по собі не надто оригінальний - просто з підступами темних сил доведеться справлятися самостійно.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nСам сюжетний сюжет не витримує особливої оригінальності - вам просто доведеться на власному поясі розібратися з тенетами темних сил.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: In China you can only lease land.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n中国では土地を借りることしかできません。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n在中国，你只能租房。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: If you want your child to be a future pianist, you should try this product out!\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n子供が将来ピアニストになるならこの商品を試してみたい!\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nお子さんに将来ピアニストになりたいなら、ぜひこの商品をお試しください!\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Well, going back to the automatic evaluation, the problem with mismatch is that the output is correctly inflected, but the context is different.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nさて、自動評価に戻りますが、ミスマッチの問題は、出力が正しく反映されているが、文脈が異なることです。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n问题是输出正确曲, 但背景不同.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 【比較表】薬剤師転職サイト - 一覧比較表でおすすめ紹介\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n[Comparison Table] pharmacist turnover site - Recommended by List Comparison Table\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n[Comparison Table]Pharmacist Recruitment Site - Recommended Listings in the Comparison Table\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: V jednom z případů se dokonce i v nočních hodinách vloupal do rodinného domu, ve kterém spali nic netušící majitelé.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nВ одному з випадків він навіть увірвався в нічний час в сімейний будинок, в якому спали нічого не підозрюючі господарі.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nВ одному з випадків навіть в години ночі він увірвався в сімейний будинок, в якому спали нічого не підозрюючі господарі.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Program je pro studenty povinný jako celek, v případě dvou neomluvených absencí je jeho místo nabídnuto dalšímu zájemci\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nПрограма обов'язкова для студентів в цілому, в разі двох неявок з поважної причини її місце пропонується іншій зацікавленій особі\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nПрограма є обов'язковою для студентів в цілому, у разі двох необбачених прогулів її місце пропонується іншому зацікавленому кандидату\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: From here, the size of the groups drops significantly.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nここから、グループのサイズは大幅に減少します。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n群体的规模从此就会大幅下降.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: A lot of things I order in purple always come too light, too kiddish, too weird, too neon-ish, what have you.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n私が紫色で注文するものの多くは、常に軽すぎたり、子供っぽすぎたり、奇妙すぎたり、ネオンっぽすぎたりします。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我订购的很多紫色东西总是太浅了，太开玩笑了，太奇怪了，太霓虹了，你有什么。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I was fortunate enough to spend a memorable six months alongside Nicholas in 2011 supporting a range of projects.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n私は幸運にも、2011年にニコラスと一緒にさまざまなプロジェクトをサポートする思い出に残る6ヶ月間を過ごすことができました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我很幸运在2011年能与尼古拉斯一起度过令人难忘的六个月,\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: And then domain-adapted [PROJECT5] setup, which is used only to spot the keywords.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n只有在发现关键字时才会使用.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n然后是适用于域的 [PROJECT5] 设置，它仅用于识别关键字。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Puzzles are hard but not in a logical sense.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nパズルは難しいですが、論理的な意味ではありません。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n谜题很难，但不是在逻辑上。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: We show that environmental constraints on the receiver's referent choice can be unilaterally exploited by the sender, without disambiguation capabilities on the receiver's end.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n我々は、受信者の参照先の選択に対する環境的制約が送信者によって一方的に利用され、受信者側の曖昧さ回避能力がないことを示している。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我们的研究表明，发送方可以单方面利用环境对接收方参照物选择的限制，而接收方则不具备消歧能力。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: That's still no reason to give him another venue, but the harm is being exaggerated.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nそれでも、それはトランプに別の場を与える理由にはならないが、悪意というのは大袈裟すぎる。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nそれでも彼に別の会場を与える理由にはならないが、その害は誇張されている。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: レジ袋乳白色表面エンボス付きタイプ\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nPlastic bag, milky white with embossed surface\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nPlastic bags, translucent, with embossing\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: In dem zerstörten Dorf nordwestlich von Limoges, dessen Ruinen erhalten blieben, wurde 1999 ein Gedenkzentrum eingerichtet. Frankreichs Präsident Emmanuel Macron hatte Hébras vor einem Jahr mit dem nationalen Verdienstorden ausgezeichnet. Hébras habe für die Freiheit gekämpft und die Werte Frankreichs verteidigt, sagte Macron. Außerdem habe er zum deutsch-französischen Frieden beigetragen. Der Überlebende hatte sich unter anderem für deutsch-französische Jugendbegegnungen eingesetzt.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nA memorial centre was established in the destroyed village northwest of Limoges, whose ruins were not destroyed. French President Emmanuel Macron had awarded Hébras the National Order of Merit a year ago. He said Hébras had fought for freedom and defended the values of France. He also contributed to Franco-German peace.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nA memorial center was established in 1999 in the ruined village northwest of Limoges, whose ruins have survived. French President Emmanuel Macron awarded Hébras the National Order of Merit a year ago. Hebras fought for freedom and defended France’s values, Macron said. He also contributed to the Franco-German peace. Among other things, the survivor had worked for Franco-German youth meetings.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: And I never got comfy there.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nそして、私は決してそこに快適ではなかった。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n而且我在那里从来没有感到舒服。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Yet, unimaginable fear, terror and displacement have left them with the invisible scar of trauma.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nしかし、想像を絶する恐怖、恐怖、避難は、彼らに目に見えないトラウマの傷跡を残しました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n让他们留下一个看不见的创伤痕迹.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 国旗掲揚式が、執り行われた。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThe flag was raised.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nA flag-raising ceremony was held.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: V mateřské škole Na kopečku u zvonečku na ulici Horní 17 bylo úspěšně dokončeno zateplení fasády.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nУ дитячому садку \"На копійку у дзвіночок\" на вул. Горні, 17 успішно завершено роботи з утеплення фасаду.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nУ дитячому садку \"На копечку у звонечку\" по вулиці Горні, 17, було успішно завершено утеплення фасаду.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: To all the investors out there, I raise a toast to your success and the realization of your dreams.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nすべての投資家の皆様へ、皆様の成功と夢の実現に乾杯します。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n皆様のご活躍と夢の実現を心よりお祝い申し上げます。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 面白いと思う人がいるから、業界が成り立っているのでは？\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nBecause there are people who think it's interesting, is the industry established?\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIsn't the industry thriving because there are people who find it interesting?\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: ※テープカッターは付属しておりません。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n*Doesn't come with a tape cutter.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nPlease note that the tape cutter is not included.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.