|
|
---
|
|
|
license: mit
|
|
|
task_categories:
|
|
|
- text-classification
|
|
|
tags:
|
|
|
- mhc
|
|
|
- peptide
|
|
|
- immunology
|
|
|
- out-of-distribution
|
|
|
- modality-shift
|
|
|
- binding-affinity
|
|
|
- eluted-ligand
|
|
|
size_categories:
|
|
|
- 1M<n<10M
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Modality OOD Dataset
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Dataset Description
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Modality OOD dataset tests model generalization across **different data modalities** in peptide-MHC (pMHC) binding prediction. It contains two complementary datasets representing distinct experimental measurement types:
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **BA (Binding Affinity)**: In vitro binding affinity measurements with continuous values
|
|
|
- **EL (Eluted Ligand)**: Mass spectrometry-based eluted ligand data with binary labels
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Key Features
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **Modality Shift Testing**: Evaluates if models trained on one modality (e.g., BA) can generalize to another (e.g., EL)
|
|
|
- **Real-World Relevance**: Reflects the practical challenge of applying models across different experimental platforms
|
|
|
- **Large Scale**: Combined 3.85M samples across 130+ HLA alleles
|
|
|
- **Single Allele Format**: Each sample has one peptide-HLA pair (no multi-allele)
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Biological Significance
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Why Two Modalities Matter:**
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. **Binding Affinity (BA)**:
|
|
|
- Measures peptide-MHC binding strength in controlled conditions
|
|
|
- Continuous scale (0 = no binding, 1 = strong binding)
|
|
|
- Reflects thermodynamic stability
|
|
|
- Common in immunoinformatics training data
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. **Eluted Ligand (EL)**:
|
|
|
- Peptides naturally presented on cell surface MHC molecules
|
|
|
- Binary label (1 = naturally presented, 0 = not presented)
|
|
|
- Reflects cellular processing, TAP transport, and MHC loading
|
|
|
- More biologically relevant but harder to obtain
|
|
|
|
|
|
**The Modality Gap:**
|
|
|
Models trained on BA data often fail on EL data (and vice versa) because:
|
|
|
- BA measures binding only, EL captures the full antigen processing pathway
|
|
|
- Different experimental biases and noise profiles
|
|
|
- Label semantics differ (affinity vs. presentation)
|
|
|
|
|
|
This dataset enables testing cross-modality generalization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Dataset Structure
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Files
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **ba_s.csv**: Binding Affinity dataset (single allele)
|
|
|
- **el_s.csv**: Eluted Ligand dataset (single allele)
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Data Format
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both files share the same schema:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Column | Type | Description | Required |
|
|
|
|--------|------|-------------|----------|
|
|
|
| peptide | string | Peptide amino acid sequence (8-15aa) | Yes |
|
|
|
| HLA | string | HLA allele (e.g., HLA-A02:01, HLA-B07:02) | Yes |
|
|
|
| label | float/int | BA: continuous 0-1, EL: binary 0/1 | Yes |
|
|
|
| HLA_sequence | string | HLA pseudo-sequence | Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Dataset Statistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### BA (Binding Affinity)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **Total Samples**: 170,470
|
|
|
- **Label Type**: Continuous (0.0 to 1.0)
|
|
|
- **Mean Affinity**: 0.2547
|
|
|
- **Median Affinity**: 0.0847
|
|
|
- **Unique HLA Alleles**: 111
|
|
|
- **Peptide Lengths**: 8-14 amino acids (74.3% are 9-mers)
|
|
|
- **File Size**: 10.61 MB
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### EL (Eluted Ligand)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **Total Samples**: 3,679,405
|
|
|
- **Label Type**: Binary classification
|
|
|
- **Positive Samples**: 197,547 (5.4%)
|
|
|
- **Negative Samples**: 3,481,858 (94.6%)
|
|
|
- **Unique HLA Alleles**: 130
|
|
|
- **Peptide Lengths**: 8-15 amino acids (distributed across all lengths)
|
|
|
- **File Size**: 213.35 MB
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Combined Statistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **Total Samples**: 3,849,875
|
|
|
- **Unique HLA Coverage**: 130+ alleles across HLA-A, B, C
|
|
|
- **Modalities**: 2 (BA and EL)
|
|
|
- **Task Type**: Peptide-MHC (PM) binding prediction
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Usage
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Load with Pandas
|
|
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
|
from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download
|
|
|
import pandas as pd
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Download BA dataset
|
|
|
ba_file = hf_hub_download(
|
|
|
repo_id="YYJMAY/modality-ood",
|
|
|
filename="ba_s.csv",
|
|
|
repo_type="dataset"
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
ba_df = pd.read_csv(ba_file)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Download EL dataset
|
|
|
el_file = hf_hub_download(
|
|
|
repo_id="YYJMAY/modality-ood",
|
|
|
filename="el_s.csv",
|
|
|
repo_type="dataset"
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
el_df = pd.read_csv(el_file)
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Use with SPRINT Framework
|
|
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
|
from sprint.core.dataset_manager import DatasetManager
|
|
|
|
|
|
manager = DatasetManager()
|
|
|
config = {
|
|
|
'hf_repo': 'YYJMAY/modality-ood',
|
|
|
'files': ['ba_s.csv', 'el_s.csv'],
|
|
|
'ba': 'ba_s.csv',
|
|
|
'el': 'el_s.csv'
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
files = manager.get_dataset('modality_ood', config)
|
|
|
ba_file = files['ba']
|
|
|
el_file = files['el']
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Example: Cross-Modality Evaluation
|
|
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
|
import pandas as pd
|
|
|
from your_model import YourModel
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Load data
|
|
|
ba_df = pd.read_csv(ba_file)
|
|
|
el_df = pd.read_csv(el_file)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Scenario 1: Train on BA, test on EL
|
|
|
model = YourModel()
|
|
|
model.train(ba_df)
|
|
|
el_predictions = model.predict(el_df)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Scenario 2: Train on EL, test on BA
|
|
|
model = YourModel()
|
|
|
model.train(el_df)
|
|
|
ba_predictions = model.predict(ba_df)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Evaluate cross-modality generalization
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Experimental Design
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Recommended Evaluation Scenarios
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. **BA → EL Generalization**
|
|
|
- Train on BA (continuous labels)
|
|
|
- Test on EL (binary labels)
|
|
|
- Measures if affinity-based models predict presentation
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. **EL → BA Generalization**
|
|
|
- Train on EL (binary labels)
|
|
|
- Test on BA (continuous labels)
|
|
|
- Measures if presentation-based models predict affinity
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. **Mixed Training**
|
|
|
- Train on both BA and EL
|
|
|
- Test separately on each
|
|
|
- Measures multi-task learning benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. **Modality-Specific Training**
|
|
|
- Train and test on same modality
|
|
|
- Baseline for comparison
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Metrics Considerations
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **For BA**: Use regression metrics (MSE, MAE, Pearson correlation)
|
|
|
- **For EL**: Use classification metrics (AUC, F1, precision, recall)
|
|
|
- **Cross-modal**: May need to binarize BA predictions or convert EL to scores
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Construction Method
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both datasets were constructed to ensure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. **Single Allele Format**: Each sample has exactly one HLA allele
|
|
|
2. **Quality Control**:
|
|
|
- No missing values in required columns
|
|
|
- No duplicate peptide-HLA-label combinations
|
|
|
- Peptide lengths filtered to 8-15 amino acids
|
|
|
3. **Standardized HLA Format**: HLA-A02:01 format (with hyphen prefix)
|
|
|
4. **Representative Coverage**: 130+ HLA alleles across major supertypes
|
|
|
5. **Balanced Lengths**: Both datasets include diverse peptide lengths
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Citation
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you use this dataset, please cite:
|
|
|
|
|
|
```bibtex
|
|
|
@dataset{modality_ood_2024,
|
|
|
title={Modality OOD Dataset for Peptide-MHC Binding Prediction},
|
|
|
author={SPRINT Framework Contributors},
|
|
|
year={2024},
|
|
|
url={https://huggingface.co/datasets/YYJMAY/modality-ood}
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Related Datasets
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **Allelic OOD**: Tests generalization to rare HLA alleles
|
|
|
- **Temporal OOD**: Tests generalization to new data over time
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **No CDR3 sequences**: These datasets are for PM (Peptide-MHC) tasks only, not PMT (Peptide-MHC-TCR)
|
|
|
- **Label semantics differ**: BA is continuous affinity, EL is binary presentation
|
|
|
- **Experimental platforms differ**: BA from in vitro assays, EL from mass spectrometry
|
|
|
- **Biological processes differ**: BA measures binding only, EL captures full pathway
|
|
|
|
|
|
## License
|
|
|
|
|
|
MIT License
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Contact
|
|
|
|
|
|
For questions or issues, please open an issue on the dataset repository.
|
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Keywords**: peptide-MHC binding, immunology, binding affinity, eluted ligand, modality shift, out-of-distribution, generalization, cross-modal learning
|
|
|
|